<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.ca.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The IT Governance Evangelist  - All Comments</title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/default.aspx</link><description>Passionate advocacy for improving IT Governance processes</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: Brazil </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/06/17/brazil.aspx#1286</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:39:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1286</guid><dc:creator>Steve Romero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment Joan. Yes, it was ironic and I winced when I heard it. I had reservations about contradicting a fellow speaker but his comment provided a great opportunity for me to change this perception of IT Governance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1286" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Brazil </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/06/17/brazil.aspx#1285</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1285</guid><dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Steve. Sounds like you had a good time in Sao Paolo. Interesting perspective on life/IT in Brazil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ironic that the speaker who preceeded you thinks ITG is &amp;quot;not exciting.&amp;quot; Attendees sure got two different POVs from that panel!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1285" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>If they don’t know it’s broke, they won’t care that ITG can fix it </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1263</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:23:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1263</guid><dc:creator>The IT Governance Evangelist </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the second blog inspired by a comment Rodney Sculthorpe made to my blog entitled &amp;amp;quot; Who owns&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1263" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting IT a Seat at the Business Leadership Table </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1241</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:57:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1241</guid><dc:creator>The IT Governance Evangelist </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This blog entry was inspired by a comment posted by &amp;amp;quot;Mike&amp;amp;quot; to my recent post entitled &amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1241" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How do you convince Executive Management of the merits of ITG? </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1239</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:49:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1239</guid><dc:creator>The IT Governance Evangelist </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This blog entry was inspired by a comment posted by Rodney Sculthorpe to my recent post entitled &amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1239" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Who owns IT Governance, the Business or IT? </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1235</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:03:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1235</guid><dc:creator>Steve Romero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Rodney/Mike: Excellent questions. Answers to them deserve prominent placement in my blog. Please look for new posts based on your comments in the coming days. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1235" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Who owns IT Governance, the Business or IT? </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1231</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1231</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve - Another great read! &amp;nbsp;To piggy back on Rodney&amp;#39;s question about convincing execs, how do you recommend convincing the IT department to &amp;#39;accept&amp;#39; their role as a business partner especially when IT Governance isn&amp;#39;t adopted within an organization? &amp;nbsp;Is there a general rule or set of steps that companies can begin to use as a foundation for change which you found that both &amp;quot;sides&amp;quot; can agree on?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1231" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Who owns IT Governance, the Business or IT? </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/05/09/who-owns-it-governance-the-business-or-it.aspx#1230</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:19:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1230</guid><dc:creator>Rodney Sculthorpe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve - Interesting read, and thanks for posting about your meeting. Seems you had eager people...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Question: how do you convince exec&amp;#39;s that EA Governance and IT Governance is needed when they don&amp;#39;t understand what it really is, and can&amp;#39;t see why they need it? Yes, they are exec&amp;#39;s, but this is a small to medium sized company that is growing quickly and they really have not been exposed to the need for controlling processes as the company get bigger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem I have is they want to &amp;quot;see&amp;quot; something that they can &amp;quot;touch and smell&amp;quot; - if you get my drift. They want to be convinced with conclusive proof, BEFORE governance is implemented, that it is going to bring value to the company. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How would you go about doing this? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1230" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Straight Talk About Project Failures  </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/04/28/straight-talk-about-project-failures.aspx#1205</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:03:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1205</guid><dc:creator>Steve Romero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hunter, thanks for the comment. Although your IT Governance planet might still appear to be desolate, I hope you feel less isolated. You are not alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1205" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Straight Talk About Project Failures  </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/04/28/straight-talk-about-project-failures.aspx#1197</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:1197</guid><dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know why you don&amp;#39;t get more comments, your coverage of this topic lets me know I am not the only one living on this desolate, isolated planet we call IT Governance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; keep it up!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1197" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: My interview in Michael Krigsman’s “IT Project Failures” blog  </title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2008/01/11/my-interview-in-michael-krigsman-s-it-project-failures-blog.aspx#940</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:940</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Steve aka IT Governance Evangelist,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I apologize for having to leave a comment, but I couldn&amp;#39;t find an email address as well. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve enjoyed reading your blog and wanted to invite you to submit an article to Corporate Portfolio Management Association to share your subject matter expertise. &amp;nbsp;The CPMA has 140+ members and thousands of visitors and we&amp;#39;re always looking for those with subject matter expertise which would be relevant/interesting to our members &amp;amp; site visitors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can visit &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.corporateportfoliomanagement.org/the_edge.html"&gt;www.corporateportfoliomanagement.org/the_edge.html&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or if any questions, please write us at content@corporateportfoliomanagement.org.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We look forward to sharing your expertise on the CPMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=940" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: No Such Thing as IT Governance?</title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2007/10/30/no-such-thing-as-it-governance.aspx#676</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:26:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:676</guid><dc:creator>Steve Romero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment, Alan. I completely agree with your contention that IT Governance is not a function of the IT Team, which is why I contend it is a function of the Board of Directors. And though ITG is “no more complex, conceptually, than extending corporate governance to IT,” the mechanisms for governing IT differ from the mechanisms historically used to govern other business units. ISACA (the authors of COBIT) also agrees that COBIT is not a complete Governance framework. This is evidenced by their recent publication of ValIT, a framework to optimize the realization of value from IT investments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=676" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: No Such Thing as IT Governance?</title><link>http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/archive/2007/10/30/no-such-thing-as-it-governance.aspx#661</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8d07cc69-a460-48f1-844d-25b05ba87317:661</guid><dc:creator>Alan Calder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's an interesting post. &amp;nbsp;I would say that IT Governance is no more complex, conceptually, than extending corporate governance to IT. CobiT is not a complete IT governance framework – but it is a very useful internal control framework for IT. IT Governance is not a function of the IT team. The board is responsible for IT, just as it is for sales, marketing, HR, etc (as I wrote in one of my books, ‘IT Governance: Guidelines for Directors’).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alan Calder&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.ca.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=661" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>