CA Community






Process Success in an Anti-Process Organization

Published: February 08 2010, 02:46 PM
by Steve Romero

How are the processes in your organization? Do people follow them? Do they work well?

Many if not most of the companies I visit struggle when it comes to process. Process continues to be a four-letter-word. Processes are viewed as bureaucratic, cumbersome, overly-complex and slow. In most cases, these views are indeed warranted.

I recently spent the evening with two senior IT leaders from a major technology company. They work in what I call a "loose" IT environment. They have little or no governance and very little formal process. Their teams are comprised of people who have worked together for many years and "just get the work done."

This model has served them in the past, quite successfully. But the company has recently experienced incredible success and growth and the work is coming at a much faster rate while staffing levels remain the same. Yes, the work is still getting done, but these two Senior IT Leaders see disaster looming on the horizon. The pain and negative residue has greatly increased from the chaos and aftermath of informal and ad hoc work processes. They anticipate a day of reckoning if they don't take action.

The actions they are investigating are governance and process, and they do so at their own peril. Their company views these disciplines in a very negative light. These two Leaders recognize they have a tough row to hoe ahead and we spent the evening discussing their challenge and sharing ideas.

My time with them inspired me to post a list of very high-level recommendations for introducing governance and process to an organization that is dead-set against these conventions.

  1. Ensure you have an acute understanding of customer needs and your business objectives
  2. Uncover and reveal the problems associated with meeting those needs and objectives
  3. Recognize and learn to empathize with those who feel the most pain from these problems
  4. Identify an Executive Sponsor and/or enlist a legion of rank-and-file supporters
  5. Quantify the cost of the problems
  6. Ascertain the potential solutions to the problems
  7. Quantify the cost of the solutions
  8. Recognize and listen to the people that are against your solutions or just anti-process
  9. Do not take a prescriptive approach to any proposed solution
  10. Know there is no one-size-that-fits-all
  11. Select the correct "flavor" of the solution - dictated by the specific problems to be solved and influenced by the current culture, capacity, and capability of the organization
  12. Thoughtfully implement the solution - in multiple iterative phases that produce measurable improvements quickly
  13. Take what you learn from previous process implementation phases and apply that knowledge to improving subsequent phases
  14. Constantly strike the balance between too much and too little process and between too complex and too simple
  15. Take a sympathetic position with everyone who hates your process and gain an understanding of what incents them to avoid, undermine or destroy your process
  16. Measure results and respond accordingly

Yes, this is a very high-level and minimal list, but I think it's a good start. I could expand on any of these points to an enormous degree but I want to keep this post simple. I would love to hear what you think of the list and if you have anything to add. I, like the two IT Leaders taking on the process challenge, can always use the help.

Steve Romero, IT Governance Evangelist

Share this post:  EmailEmail

 

By: Steve Romero
Steve Romero is the IT Governance Evangelist at CA Technologies, Inc. His mission is to help enterprises realize the full potential of their IT investments for strategic and competitive advantage. In this capacity, he acts as a strong advocate for the customer, speaking around the world to users, prospective...
Read More..

2 people have left comments:

Good summary Steve. Having reviewed your list of recommendations it struck me that the most difficult task to comply with will be #14. Most companies tend to be overly cautious and risk averse, ending up in a complex web of processes aimed at reducing any imaginable risk. So I’m not sure how exactly you strike this balance without actually experimenting and failing with different process options.

Cheers,

Shim

Posted by: Shim Marom | March 8, 2010 11:37 PM

This is the sort of consultancy that is being done in most part of the world. But I still hold on to some of the fundamental doubts, after all the organization is for the people, I do not still think it is the other way around. Work should be play and again not vice versa. We could even go to the extent of sacrificing growth for the sake of maintaining a comfortable level of comfort. I hope I got through in this communication.

Posted by: Sundararajaniyer | June 14, 2010 4:11 AM

Leave a Comment

* An asterisk indicates a required field

* :  

:

* :  

 Submit