CA Community






Do You Love Your PMO?

Published: April 21 2009, 12:24 PM
by Steve Romero

I struggled with the title of this blog. I first called it, "PMO as a Partner in Success" which I then changed to, "Getting More Value from Your PMO." Though I firmly believe in each of these propositions neither of these labels worked for me.

So I spent some time reflecting on the inspiration for this post. It was a recent exchange I had with Demian Entrekin of IT Toolbox fame http://it.toolbox.com/people/dentrekin/ . Demian wrote a post titled, "In English please..." In his post he wrote, "Statements like ‘Transforming IT' may sound pretty but don't always provide a whole lot of meaning." Demian then went on to provide his interpretation of transforming IT which prompted me to share some of my ideas on the subject. In one of his responses to my responses Demian wrote:

"Steve, I just had a great conversation with the CIO of Forbes, and his view is that the PMO can (and should) act as a change agent. In other words, rather than simply running the PMO as the project police, the folks in the PMO actively look for ways to create more value for the organization as a whole, using IT as a leverage point. This certainly supports your point."

Ahhhh, this was music to my ears. And not simply because my point was being supported (though it is nice when that occasionally occurs). First, the statement supported my long standing assertion that technology should be leveraged for strategic advantage as opposed to being a cost that is managed. Second, I loved hearing about the role of the PMO at Forbes - the role of value creator.

I say loved because that was truly the feeling I had. I love IT Governance and the power and promise it provides. I love IT Governance processes that lead to reasoned and rationale decisions in the use of technology. And I love PMOs that enable aspects of the discipline, though I find they rarely do.

Almost every PMO I have ever encountered acts as project process enforcers and paper-pushers. Their role is simple, establish project management methodology and then report on the use of that methodology - ergo, the unenviable position of Project Police. Though just about everyone agrees (especially me) that sound project management practices are a good idea, these PMOs almost always degrade into something that Executive Management views as overhead, and PMs and project staff view as something that should be avoided.

Couple the doomed "Project Police" model with the fact that few PMOs are backed with sound enterprise-led PPM (Project and Portfolio Management) and it is no wonder so many projects fail. (Michal Krigsman has a blog dedicated to "IT Project Failure" that I highly recommend. http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/ ) Effective PPM is essential because it ensures the PMO is given a reasoned and rational portfolio of investments upon which to deliver.

If PMOs are to have any hope of aspiring to the vision and purpose of the PMO at Forbes they must be backed by good governance, good PPM processes and they must be chartered in the role of "value creator." In this circumstance PMOs will help to make work possible and practical. The will help to make people successful and they will be loved.

I travel the world on a quest to help enterprises aspire to this audacious goal. I have 5 presentations I deliver with great regularity and they all play a role:

  • Understanding and Achieving Sustainable IT Governance
  • Meeting Enterprise Goals Through Project and Portfolio Management
  • Critical Components of Effective PMOs
  • Enabling Stellar Performance with Process Management
  • Meaningful Metrics

I love delivering these presentations and I do so in CA Field Marketing Events, at professional association conferences such as PMI, ISACA and itSMF, and at individual companies. And now CA is offering them in a series of webcasts. I delivered the IT Governance presentation this past Tuesday and if you missed it a recording is available at https://myclarity.webex.com/myclarity/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=EC&rID=50767772&rKey=C0CA819947BD5CBF.

I will be webcasting the other four presentations every other Tuesday at 8:00 AM PST for the next two months. I invite you to join me by registering at:

Session 2 PPM:  https://myclarity.webex.com/myclarity/onstage/g.php?t=a&d=599166558

Session 3 PMO:  https://myclarity.webex.com/myclarity/onstage/g.php?t=a&d=591596258

Session 4 Process:  https://myclarity.webex.com/myclarity/onstage/g.php?t=a&d=596021503

Session 5 Metrics:  https://myclarity.webex.com/myclarity/onstage/g.php?t=a&d=591676154

I just finished delivering my PMO presentation to a Clarity User Group in North Carolina. I asked them if people "loved their PMOs." They all laughed. Though it was a nice lighthearted moment, I would have liked a different response. Together, I believe we can turn the answer to this question to "yes."

Steven Romero, IT Governance Evangelist

Share this post:  

 

By: Steve Romero
Steve Romero is the IT Governance Evangelist at CA Technologies, Inc. His mission is to help enterprises realize the full potential of their IT investments for strategic and competitive advantage. In this capacity, he acts as a strong advocate for the customer, speaking around the world to users, prospective...
Read More..

5 people have left comments:

Steve, good post.  I will be playing back your presentations as IT governance and PPM are of great interest to me and my work.

I would like to add my two cents:  IT can no more create value than a shovel can create a hole.  They're both tools that enable their respective benefits.  If the processes that employ the tools are flawed, the results will be of diminished value.

That's why, in my opinion, PPM is too sophisticated for most companies.  They don't have the level of discipline required to create the value that the tool could otherwise enable.

This doesn't mean that the tools are not valuable.  It just means that most companies won't receive the benefits that they expected because they think that those benefits are inherent in having purchased the tool instead of building processes that will leverage the capabilities of the tool.

Posted by: Bill Monroe | April 22, 2009 7:46 AM

Thanks for the comments Bill.

I won't get into the literal interpretation of IT as a value creator. I was simply expressing an idea and I have a strong feeling we're in agreement.

I also agree that PPM is a challenge for most organizations - though I don't characterize PPM as a tool. It is a critical governance process that may or may not be enabled by a tool or set of tools.

I do agree that it is a complex process that requires organizations to raise their capability and competency levels to exploit. If it was easy, everyone would already be doing it. Despite the sophistication required, I will continue to help organizations aspire to embrace the concepts, foster the capability and enable their folks to master the discipline.

Steve

Posted by: Steve Romero | April 22, 2009 10:54 AM

Steve,

I agree with you, including your correction of my misrepresentation of PPM as a tool rather than a process.  I guess I tend to focus more on the tools because so often companies fail to understand that the tools, in and of themselves, aren't the solution to their challenges.

And, as you continue to help organizations aspire to embrace the concepts, capability, and discipline, I will continue to help organizations understand that the benefits of the tools can't be realized as long as the underlying processes are flawed.

In that respect, I think we complement each other pretty well.

Bill Monroe, Chief Collaboration Officer

Posted by: Bill Monroe | April 22, 2009 11:19 AM

Bil, thanks for including your title on your last comment. It gives me hope.

Steve

Posted by: Steve Romero | April 22, 2009 11:28 AM

Totally agree. From my experience my opinion is that even with the most advanced PM methodologies and PPM tools plus the best PM's and PMO’s does not mean that an IT Project is guaranteed to be a success.

Success or failure is determined even before the project commences and is driven by the level of strategic project decision making.

A lack of strategic pre-investment decision making, pre-implementation planning and execution by C-Level and senior executives will inevitably result in poor project processes which are required by the PMO, PM and Project team to drive and manage the project.

These parties can only successfully manage what has been decided and planned by the top level executives at the outset of the project. If these decisions are poor, absent or under supported so too will the project processes be and consequently these parties will just end up as glorified/victimized Project Fire fighters.

Sarah Runge

Posted by: ProfilingPro | April 22, 2009 4:27 PM

Leave a Comment

* An asterisk indicates a required field

* :  

:

* :  

 Submit