CA Community






This Blog

Why Is SLM So Difficult To Implement?

Published: November 12 2009, 12:36 PM
by Michael King

Want to know what I do for CA?  I think about Service Management, specifically Service Level Management.  I don't just think about it, I create and test SLM scenarios, speak with customers regarding SLM implementations and assist them with their implementations and look for ways that SLM can integrate with other ITIL processes. There is one thing that I have found to be consistent with many of these initiatives and efforts: SLM is difficult and challenging to implement.

After a conversation with some colleagues, I got to asking myself, ‘self, why is SLM so difficult to implement?'

The answer that I came up with is in order to implement SLM, an IT organization needs to have a few components in place before they can start identifying, documenting and agreeing upon service levels, actually measuring and reporting on them. 

Challenge #1:  The first component that needs to be in place is the actual service definition.  As discussed in my colleague Peter Doherty's blog, ‘What nobody will tell you regarding defining Services in Service Management - Heresy you say!', this can be quite a challenging task, because the guidelines for defining a service are vague at best.  After working with many customers and other CA professionals, I can say that there is still some debate about what a service should or should not be.

Challenge #2:  Once the challenge of defining the service offering has been conquered, the next component is to identify and document the service levels for delivering the service offering.  As ITIL states, these service levels should be SMART:

  • Specific
  • Measurable
  • Achievable
  • Realistic
  • Timely

Here is where the challenge comes into play, how does the IT organization do this? The IT organization needs to determine if metrics are set up to measure and support service levels.  IT also needs to know what their baselines are and over what time span or if they even exist.

Challenge #3:  Once the IT organization conquers Challenge #2, they need start reporting on the service levels.  This challenge has always been interesting for me.  This is the challenge that forces the IT organization to look at its KPIs and address the following sub-challenges:

  • What data is needed to evaluate the KPIs?
  • Where is the data located and how to gain access to this data?
  • Who owns the data and how to convince them to give access to this data?
  • How load and normalize the data so that it can be used?

From experience, addressing these sub-challenges can be daunting and time consuming.

If your IT organization can conquer these challenges and manage to put these components in place, your IT organization will be able to implement SLM and show its value to the business.

Share this post:  

 

By: Michael King
Michael King is a Senior Engineering Services Architect in CA’s Service Management group. Michael has over 19 years of experience in IT that includes software engineering, operations management, systems integrations, and process reengineering. Currently, Michael concentrates on Service Level Management...
Read More..

5 people have left comments:

How interesting !!!!  I was begining to believe that I´m the only crazy person who believes this is hard !!!  As you mentioned at the article, there are so many challenges in this SLA field.

What do you think about the challenge of "improve" what you have, after challenges #1,2 and 3 are covered?  It´s very hard to re-think all over again.  

Thanks in advance for your attention, regards

Yaravi Cardoze

Panama City, Panama

Posted by: Yaravi Cardoze | November 12, 2009 3:52 PM

You might also consider the work here:

nobelprize.org/.../sci.html

In particular, some of the work on the transactional costs of defining the boundaries of firms is vital to understanding WHY we run into the problems that we do.

Posted by: Random Commentor | November 12, 2009 4:54 PM

Hi Yaravi,

My opinion on the challenge of improve is that it is dependent upon the details of the SLA that was negotiated.  I don't think that the IT organization or MSP should be rethinking or reworking a well managed service offering, unless the service provider and their business partner or customer have re-analyzed the service and have identified room for improvement on the service.  The reasons for improvment should be that the service can be delivered more reliably, cost effectively and, if required, to a larger audience.  But in order to do all of this, the negotiated, active SLA should detail the process for identifying and implementing service improvements that will be agreed upon by the service provider and service consumer.

I hope this provides more information.

Michael

Posted by: Michael King | November 15, 2009 10:22 PM

In my last blog entry , I discussed some of the challenges associated with implementing SLM. I received

Posted by: CA on Service Management | December 3, 2009 2:10 PM

In my first installment of ‘ Why Is SLM So Difficult To Implement ', I discussed 3 of the many challenges

Posted by: CA on Service Management | February 13, 2010 6:19 AM

Leave a Comment

* An asterisk indicates a required field

* :  

:

* :  

 Submit