Published: October 26 2009, 08:15 AM | no comments
by Viki Paige

Z9HA4WPWNWRB 

We have some exciting news to share today.  After months of development and working with end users, we have officially unveiled our new CA ecoSoftware solutions designed to help organizations manage carbon emissions, reduce the consumption of natural resources and cut energy costs. We also announced on Friday that we have earned accreditation from the Carbon Disclosure Project as a Carbon Calculation Partner.

The two new ecoSoftware products offer a comprehensive solution addressing sustainability management, carbon management, environmental assessments and operational energy management.  Our goal is to help companies manage the implementation, progress and outcomes of global sustainability initiatives more effectively, to measure and report reliably on energy and natural resource consumption, to account for carbon emissions, and to reduce energy costs across the datacenter and facilities.

Following is a brief recap of the news, and the full release is available here.

CA ecoGovernance includes a centralized repository and management dashboard that provides visual tools for gaining improved control over enterprise-wide sustainability initiatives. It offers a common source of data based on a shared set of terms and categories, helping to facilitate collaboration, and serves as a fully-auditable system of record. It also features advanced sustainability program and project management capabilities, the ability to evaluate progress against business objectives, and automated survey assessments for use internally and externally (with suppliers or other third parties).

Tesco is using CA ecoSoftware for carbon management; check out our recent announcement on this here.

As I mentioned above, we are now a Carbon Calculation Partner of the CDP, having completed a thorough product testing and review process administered by an independent third-party authority on greenhouse gas accounting, auditing and management.  Our solution also meets the requirements of the GHG Protocol, which many organizations are using as their emissions accounting and reporting standard.

CA ecoMeter is an operational energy management solution that captures detailed energy-related information from devices within the datacenter and in other facilities across the enterprise. It is designed to allow IT, datacenter and facilities managers to attribute energy consumption and power demand to specific devices, business units, or buildings, and helps to monitor, measure, and optimize the savings of server consolidation and virtualization efforts in the datacenter. Managed services providers can leverage CA ecoMeter to more accurately account for energy consumption down to the customer level, leading to more rapid, accurate and flexible pricing models. 

Datotel, a provider of business solutions including private cloud computing, colocation, and hosted managed services, has implemented CA ecoSoftware for operational energy management.  According to Eric McFarland, facility manager at Datotel:

"We've been very pleased with the outcome of our initial implementation, completed earlier this year. CA ecoMeter allows us to better monitor and manage our datacenter capacity and energy use, and we're now in the process of expanding the solution throughout our datacenter.  We're also now able to more accurately track energy consumption down to the individual customer, allowing us to provide more detailed, automated invoicing of energy use, rather than relying on time-consuming calculations in spreadsheets. Our customers appreciate this new level of transparency, and can also use the data we provide to improve their efficiency-by better managing server load, for example-saving them money."

To learn more about our energy, carbon and sustainability solutions, visit:

• Recent News:
• http://www.ca.com/us/press/release.aspx?cid=213302
• http://www.ca.com/us/press/release.aspx?cid=217661
• http://www.ca.com/us/press/release.aspx?cid=220189
• On the Web: http://www.ca.com/ecosoftware
• On Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/CAecoSoftware

Share this post:  Email

Share

Published: October 13 2009, 11:53 AM | no comments
by Terrence Clark

A week ago today President Obama issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to lead by example in their efforts to address environmental issues surrounding energy, carbon, water, and waste.  I’m not going to go into detail on describing the contents of the EO, you can review it yourself here.  Instead I wanted to give you my thoughts on it, looking at the timing of its release, the way it mirrors how private sector organizations are addressing sustainability, the major concern I have with it, and some questions that remain unanswered.  One thing is certain the federal agencies now have their work cut out for them to achieve quite a bit in the next 90 days.

First, if we consider the timing of this executive order the cynic would say that the only reason this is being done is as an effort to try and save some face for the US when it goes to Copenhagen in December.  Just recently the administration finally admitted what we all knew for some time now, and that is that the US won’t have a climate change bill in place before Copenhagen (news stories here and here). Others may say given the recent finalization of the EPA’s ruling (official press release here; news story here), it would be hypocritical if the federal government didn’t put in place a program, such as what is required by this executive order.  All of these are valid arguments, but I would instead like to focus on the positive and that is that it is leading to action being taken.  Taking action has been very hard for the US government, and it has reached the point where the only way action occurs is for the EPA to leverage the Clean Air Act or the President to issue an executive order.

In reading the EO, one thing stood out to me and that is it appeared heavily influenced by how the private sector is going about addressing these challenges.  For example, the role of the senior sustainability officer equates to a chief sustainability officer.  We have been talking to organizations for some time now about the importance of taken a governed approach to sustainability.  This is exactly what the EO focuses on.  Making sure you have a systematic approach to sustainability to help you make the right investment choices to achieve your goals.  How often do you see anything from the federal government mention ROI?  It talks about being transparent in showing how the investment decisions were made as well as showing the results of those investments.  Transparency is critical here, as you can learn which initiatives are delivering the results and which aren’t.  Those that work can be implemented across agencies and the ones that don’t need to either be shutdown or modified to ensure success.  These are all things that private sector organizations that understand the importance of a systematic approach to sustainability are doing already.

The biggest concern I have about the EO is that I am not sure how the agencies will actually be able to meet those very tight timelines.  Having spent time speaking to many organizations in both the public and private sector around the world, it is apparent to me that unless the organization has already been focusing on these efforts to understand their baseline for scope 1 and 2 emissions they won’t be able to start now and still meet the deadline.  At an event in DC last week speaking to an audience of largely representatives of federal agencies about these issues, I asked how many have a basic understanding of what needs to be done to calculate one’s carbon footprint.  Only two hands went up in the entire audience, and one was from my co-presenter and the other worker with the co-presenter.  This didn’t give me a confident feeling that within 90 days these agencies will know their 2008 baseline and have enough insight into that information and the initiatives they could put in place to achieve their 2020 goal that they will define.  I won’t even go into the scope 3 mandate, which is even more challenging.  One just needs to ask any organization that is investigating scope 3 emissions from its value chain to know its difficulty. 

I have posed a few questions that don’t appear to be addressed in the EO.  I am interested in understanding the answers to them.  They are:

• What if any verification process is going to occur to ensure consistency and accuracy of the data collection?
• What happens if the bottom-up targets rolled up have a less than stellar total target for the federal government?
• What happens if the agencies don’t meet the deadlines in the EO or miss their defined goals?

Much like the UK’s CRC where everyone is a critic about how it is flawed, many people will find fault with this EO.  Some will say it goes too far and there are other more important things to focus on.  Others will say giving the agencies the option to set their own goals bottom-up won’t make the impact that is required.  My view is at the end of the day, the EO is forcing action to occur.  It may not be perfect, but at this point continuing an endless debate to come up with the perfect system is clearly not working.  The EO puts the debate aside at least for federal agencies and forces action to be taken.  This is a step in the right direction.

Terrence G. Clark - Senior Vice President and GM 
CA ecoSoftware
terrence.clark@ca.com

Share this post:  Email

Share