CA Community






This Blog

November 2011 - Posts

Evolution or Revolution; that’s the question… But what is the answer?

Published: November 16 2011, 10:19 AM | 1 Comment(s)
by Marcel den Hartog

The World of IT evolves. And like things in the real world, we have big revolutions (often viewed as hype) and in between those, we have evolutions. The evolutions are necessary to keep things going and to clean up some of the mess that is left by the revolutions. With this in the back of our minds, what does this make CA Technologies recent “Next Generation Mainframe Management” announcement?

To put it simply, some components have been gradually improved, some have been enhanced to make revolutions possible while others will cause a small revolution by themselves. The mainframe, by nature, is an environment where the word “revolution” does not fit. We like things to be stable, reliable and predictable. But even the mainframe sometimes needs a revolution to make sure it’s still viable in the decades that lie ahead of us.

The revolution in this case is definitely IBM’s zEnterprise and the zBX. The latter allows us to run and manage distributed workloads that depend heavily on the mainframe almost as though they are actually housed of the mainframe. So making sure that this complex environment and new technologies like Cloud are supported is key, and you will see some revolutionary changes in our strategy and products.But we are faced with many other “challenges. Challenges like: lowering the TCO of the mainframe, knowledge transfer to the next generation of mainframers, support for new technologies etc. All these challenges require changes that could be classified as evolutionary but once you look closer, you will realize that even those changes will have revolutionary elements. 

 

  • CA Mainframe Software Manager, a new and easier ways to install, maintain, deploy and configure software using a trusted technology like SMPE but with an interface that allows the less experienced to perform these complex tasks with ease
  • The CA Mainframe Chorus platform, that drives DB2-, Storage- and Security management solutions which have been around for 20+ years, offers a huge leap in user-friendliness, productivity, flexibility and knowledge sharing
  • Solutions that have been enhanced to allow them to manage Linux on System z as an integrated part of the existing zOS environment and last but not least;
  • Mainframe solutions that integrate closely with their distributed counterparts to help manage and monitor complex multi-platform applications
CA Technologies “Next Generation Mainframe Management” covers all this, and more. Parts of it are revolutionary, other parts may look like if they have gradually improved, but even those will surprise you. To get the full scope, look here.  And for once, let me know what you think, leave a comment...

 

Share this post:  

 

By: Marcel den Hartog
Marcel den Hartog is Principal Product Marketing EMEA for CA Technologies Mainframe solutions. In this role, he is a frequent speaker on both internal (customer) and external events where he talks about CA Technologies mainframe strategy, vision and market trends. Marcel joined CA Technologies in...
Read More..

The Mainframe Remains Resurgent

Published: November 15 2011, 12:43 PM | no comments
by Scott Fagen

So, I’m a couple of days into CA World ’11 and my feet hurt from being upright for double-digit hours every day, but it is heartening to see that our solid core of mainframe customers are here in force.  In fact, there are more mainframers here than the two previous CA Worlds!  The Exhibition Center is buzzing, especially around our new products, but there is also excitement around the new capabilities of the mainstays, as well. 

It’s hard for me to believe that I’ve only been with CA for a little over four years now and that the work we’ve been doing has made such a positive impact on the mainframe world.  Last week, I received an email from one of my colleagues, Greg Shriver, who was part of the infancy of what became “Mainframe 2.0.”  In the email was a set of PowerPoint slides that contained digital photographs of what we were trying to do – change the way the mainframe is managed forever.  His words echoed my thoughts, “Wow, pretty amazing that this was less than 4 years ago…”

CA World ’11 is actually marking a transition for the mainframe business at CA.  When I joined in September of 2007, the company had just formed (or, better, reformed) the mainframe business, coalescing products that had been under separate management chains for many years.  While such an organization isn’t necessarily a “bad thing,” it was not reflective of what was going on in the market.  The IBM System z10 was just around the corner and customers were beginning to recommit to (or at least admit to the fact that they weren’t abandoning ) the platform. 

For us, Mainframe 2.0 was more than just a set of things to do, it was the metaphor for changing how we went about doing our business.  I will freely admit that much of what we did borrowed liberally from my IBM past, but many of the ideas were improved upon by my CA team of architects, developers, testers and even management.  Mainframe 2.0 became the rallying point for our setting high standards around the management of software.   It helped customers manage cost through identifying ways of getting greater value from the software the customer already has and expanding the use of specialty engines within our software.  Mainframe 2.0 is also the springboard for the advent of the next CA mainframe strategy.

Here at CA World ’11, we are kicking off the “Next Generation Mainframe Management” strategy, which builds upon the foundation laid by Mainframe 2.0.  None of the initiatives within Mainframe 2.0 are forgotten, they are now considered “business as usual.”  With “Next Generation Mainframe Management” we address the next set of challenges ahead:  the transitioning of the workforce from the experienced gurus who’ve been at this since the mainframe was the only game in town to a new cast of “ambidextrous” IT staffers who work “across the silos” instead of vertically within them.  Our new products and product releases are targeted at not only making this new workforce able to function this way, but to do so effectively. 

And, I’m not just talking about the silos within the mainframe discipline, we have been working on solving many of these issues across the datacenter, with products like Cross Enterprise APM (Wily and Sysview), Workload Automation (ESP, CA 7, and Autosys), we’ve only begun to break ground on some of the exciting new technologies that we are working on in the lab, like bringing our AppLogic technology to create a compute grid that not only encompasses Linux on System z, but allows for easy connectivity to z/OS transaction and database management.  With zEnterprse, we’ll be able to extend that grid to application serving on the blades in the zBX.

Yes, we’ve been working very hard the last four years, laying the foundation for some very exciting advances in the near future.  It’s exciting to see that the customers here at CA World really “get” what we are doing and how supportive they are of our efforts.  Of course, the reward for hard work is, as always, more hard work.

Share this post:  

 

By: Scott Fagen
Scott Fagen is a distinguished engineer reporting to the CA Technologies Architecture Team. As chief architect for the company’s portfolio of mainframe technology, he sets platform strategy and leads the team of engineers that sets the technical direction for the development of its mainframe products...
Read More..

Silo's, silo's; Will Cloud finally solve this?

Published: November 09 2011, 05:11 PM | no comments
by Marcel den Hartog

Every single day during the last 20 years in my career I have been confronted with the (sometimes) bitter arguments between people who manage mainframes and those who control the distributed environment. Often, the discussions were emotional, sometimes even bitter and almost always they had no positive effect on the reputation of the IT department. Call me an optimist, but I sincerely hoped that every time a new "wave" in IT occurred, it would be the reason for both sides to start working together more.

Let me explain; in companies that owned (still own) a mainframe, distributed systems were embraced as the platform that would solve all the so-called problems the mainframe had; high cost, inflexibility and complex management. History has taught us that these promises have not worked out as expected. Of course, we now do more with IT than ever before, we run different workloads, have more users, etc, but ask any businessman about the state IT in his/her company today and he/she will tell you it is too expensive, inflexible, not agile, too much money is spent on managing and not enough on innovation. Hence the enthusiasm for Cloud. Again, we believe/hope that this new technology will solve all the "problems" IT has today.

And what happens in the meantime in the data centre? There is more competition than ever. Instead of joining forces to make sure that we do not automatically move everything to a Cloud based infrastructure (which would be just as wrong as trying to move everything off the mainframe when distributed systems were introduced) IT folks argue. Instead of focusing on a fit-for-purpose data centre where things are implemented on the platform best suited to run a particular workload, we disagree on even the simplest things. We overpromise savings so workload can be "stolen" away, and then hope that by the time people realize these savings cannot be achieved, the project can no longer be stopped.

Even the threat that it is easier to move distributed workloads to a Cloud infrastructure than it is to move mainframe workload to Cloud doesn't seem to motivate people to start working together in order to make the data centre more cost effective, efficient and integrated. Management tools that manage workload across platforms are seen as tools from the dark side. X-platform Application Performance Management solutions don't get used to bring mainframe and distributed closer together and the question "who owns Linux on the mainframe" seems to be more important than asking what it can do for the business.

It often it takes a "common enemy" to make people realize that they need to join forces. Calling Cloud an "enemy" is not correct, I realize that. Cloud IS happening for all the right reasons and has great advantages for certain types of applications and workloads. But only if we team up can we help prevent our companies from making the mistake many of us made years ago - and that is using a new platform for "everything", just because they can.

Oh, and yes, please forward this article to your distributed colleagues....

Share this post:  

 

By: Marcel den Hartog
Marcel den Hartog is Principal Product Marketing EMEA for CA Technologies Mainframe solutions. In this role, he is a frequent speaker on both internal (customer) and external events where he talks about CA Technologies mainframe strategy, vision and market trends. Marcel joined CA Technologies in...
Read More..

More Posts