Published:
May 03 2010, 09:47 AM
|
no comments
by
Marcel den Hartog
A while ago, I had a long chat with my 18 year old son. And as a result I wrote two blogs on "GenerationX". And I am not done yet....
Last week, I was in a large bank, presenting about Mainframe. And I heard the same story I've heard from many of you. "Management wanted to get rid of the Mainframe, but at the moment, we are reconsidering because we've come to realize...." You fill in the reasons.... Good things were happening: zLinux, opening up to the Distributed world, etc. But when I changed to the staffing issue, the discussion changed. "Nobody wants to work on the Mainframe, we can't get young people interested etc." And again, I sensed that "tone"... Let me explain...
There are two reasons for the IBM Mainframe being the reliable platform it is, the hardware and the people managing it. We know that managing a Mainframe is tedious, needs policies & procedures and so needs serious people who can and are willing to work in this way. These characteristics mean that "Mainframers" errm... are sometimes more introvert people than average... For most of us, when we are amongst each other, we have fun, make jokes, chat and discuss. But when we are in the company of people from the management or e.g. people managing the distributed environments many of us often switch to "defense mode", become quiet and you can almost see the "we have done/solved/invented that 20 years ago...." expression.
Now look at young kids... Even BETA folks (like my son) are socially more interactive than we were at that age. Not face-to-face, but over the Internet, gaming, chatting and teaming up for Real Time Strategy, figuring out a strategy with 4 complete strangers to beat 5 other strangers. To make these people interested in managing probably the most powerful computer system ever, not only the hardware needs to change, but the way we teach them and approach them needs to change as well.
We have a wider generation gap than any other profession, in many cases, the youngest Mainframer is 45. And this causes the communication problems I just described. In many other professions, the mix of ages is much more spread! And for good reasons! The best teams are often a good combination of experienced and inexperienced, eager and serious, young and old. I hear many "old" mainframers complain that even though everybody is complaining about the "grey" issue, they can't find a job. As hard as it sounds, Mainframe customers want to SOLVE the problem (by bringing in young people) instead of DELAYING the problem (hiring experienced Mainframers aged 50 and above). I realize this may sound harsh, and to those without a job, it must feel devastating.
But I am convinced that many HR managers will soon realize that they will still need experienced Mainframers, if only because the problems are simply getting too big. But we also need to sell ourselves differently. We HAVE something, young people (here and in India) do not have. It's called "experience".
So, with new products and solutions (have a look at what CA will be presenting at http://bit.ly/dCZ2X5) AND the experience of the current generation of Mainframers, I am sure we can keep the most powerful computer ever built running for the next decades.