CA Community






This Blog

Moby Mainframe

Published: September 21 2007, 12:25 PM
by Reg Harbeck

Call me an enthusiastic mainframe nerd. It’s time for me to admit it. After all, I’ve been working on mainframes for 20 years, and for the number one mainframe ISV for ten of those years.

 

And, I expect the mainframe to be a significant part of the rest of my career – which, by the way, I plan to last several more decades (if it’s up to me).

 

Why? Because I love quality, and being part of something very significant, and making a difference. The mainframe gives me all of these.

 

Not only that, but we’re living in a time when the IBM-360-descended mainframe environment – ecosystem, even – is at the leading edge of a renaissance, and I’m really excited to be part of it!

 

Now, if you’re a mainframer like I am, I suspect you already know exactly what I’m talking about. But just in case you’re not – or maybe you’d like to hear a voice other than your own expressing it, here are some examples:

 

  1. Virtualization, introduced on the mainframe 35 years ago, is better than ever, enabling multiple different levels of multiple different operating systems to run concurrently on a single box – with hundreds or even thousands of images at the same time.
  2. Mainframes are green! Their physical footprint, barely larger than a fridge, only hints at how small their energy and heat footprint is compared to “equivalent” computing power on other servers – especially considering that mainframes regularly run up to 100% busy for extended periods of time with no degradation in performance.
  3. Mainframes are secure. Not only are they virus-free, but they are secured with advanced and comprehensive business-focused external security that meets the regulatory and security needs of the largest organizations on earth.
  4. Mainframes are more affordable than ever, not to mention more affordable on a per user basis than other platforms when all relevant costs are accurately accounted for. Not only are all of the costs of mainframes straight-forward and measurable, but new innovations such as IBM’s zIIP and zAAP engines are making them even more cost-effective. I plan to write more about these specialty engines in future blogs.
  5. Mainframes are running Linux. Not just one or two copies: I’m talking hundreds and even thousands of concurrent copies, with performance and reliability that outstrips other platforms.

 

And that’s just the beginning!

 

Which is good, because it’s also just the beginning of this mainframe blog.

 

So, help me out here: what do you think of the above assertions? Do you have any to add – or suggest corrections to? Have you ever thought about a career on the mainframe – or maybe even with a mainframe ISV?

 

These are exciting times, and as we enter a new age for the mainframe, I’m very interested in your perspectives on this important platform.

 

Catch you soon!

 

- Reg Harbeck

 

By: Reg Harbeck
Reg Harbeck is CA's Product Management Director for Mainframe Strategy. In the more than two decades since he received his Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science he has worked with operating systems, networks, security and applications on mainframes, UNIX, Linux, Windows and other platforms. Reg...
Read More..

3 people have left comments:

G'day there Reg,

"..working on mainframes for 20 years..." - so you're a youngster then eh? :-)

I have no issue at all with your 5 points.  But I note that you've made no mention of the scourge of the MF platform - "The Aging Workforce"  (TAW)!!  ([nsert sound-bite from Hitchcock's "Psycho" here :-))]  

Question:  How will the mainframe survive when all the silver-haired old-timers retire and start tottering around the aged-care facilities with their zimmer-frames ??!!  

Answer: A resounding "No problem".  We are already seeing a number of  Fortune 1000 organisations addressing this issue by 'blooding' graduates and other younger IT staff  on mentor programs designed to equip them with skills and knowledge intended to carry them across the threshold of 'enlightenment'.

And just why are they doing this?  Because they FINALLY recognise that the messgage trucked out by vendors of mid-range and PC-sized systems over the past 10-15 years is an absolute fallacy and that mainframes are far from extinct.  

In fact, they have evolved into processors of greater relevance and usefulness to organisations with industrial-strength computing requirements than any army of small to medium sized technology can provide to them.  And for all the reasons you've listed plus more.  

The only argument I can see is whether technologies such as SOA and Java would have eventuated on mainframe systems anyway, or if they needed the existence of smaller platforms to give them birth before being ported to the mature species of robust, secure and reliable computing that mainframes have been for the past 3 decades.

Anyone care to argue THAT commentary?

Posted by: MainMan | November 1, 2007 8:39 AM

Greetings, MainMan! Thanks for making me feel young!

You make some good points. I'm planning to blog about this topic soon as well. In the meantime, I look forward to any additional comments that may be posted...

Posted by: Reg Harbeck | November 1, 2007 12:38 PM

Greetings, MainMan! Thanks for making me feel young!

You make some good points. I'm planning to blog about this topic soon as well. In the meantime, I look forward to any additional comments that may be posted...

Posted by: Reg Harbeck | November 1, 2007 12:39 PM

Leave a Comment

* An asterisk indicates a required field

* :  

:

* :  

 Submit