CA Community






Why It's a Mistake to Educate the Public on Cloud Computing

Published: January 25 2011, 10:40 AM
by Jeffrey Abbott

I was at a social gathering recently and someone asked me about my new job. I said, "I'm doing marketing for the CA Technologies cloud computing business." Recognizing that this is the point at which most people lose interest, I stopped there. However, someone else said, "What IS cloud computing?" Before I could concoct a concise answer that would shed any light on this, someone (who has spent most of his career selling beer) said, "It's basically just the Internet." Was he right? No, he wasn't. But it was the right answer for the audience.

CCL image courtesy of ashley.adcox - http://www.flickr.com/photos/viggum/2418269540/sizes/s/in/photostream/Meanwhile, I spent the next 10 minutes explaining cloud computing to the person who was stuck next to me, while everyone else was having an interactive conversation. I owe that person an apology for wasting 10 minutes of their life.

Both Microsoft and IBM have ventured into America's living rooms with cloud television ads. One uses "To the Cloud" as the slogan and apparent new answer to life, the universe, and everything. I would love to know what they are trying to achieve. Could there have been extra money left in the marketing budget and it was "use it or lose it" time?

The fact is the American public, with the exception of its nerds (or geeks, depending on which you feel is more of a compliment) doesn't and won't care. Here's why...

Cloud computing is extremely complex. If you disagree, then you should consider if you are happy with how much you have in common with Comic Book Guy. The easy way out would be to give a few examples of public cloud services. You could say "It's the difference between installing Outlook on your computer, versus using an online service such as Hotmail." Oh wait, that sounds like the Internet again. So you say "But the Internet is a network and Hotmail is a Web service. The difference of cloud is that it's pay as you go." But Hotmail is free. Whoops. Okay bad example. How about Turbo Tax? You used to buy the CD, install it on your computer and do your taxes. Now they have a cloud model, where you pay certain amounts of money to use certain functions. Or Mozy, where instead of buying an extra hard drive, you pay for storage online and you pay based on the amount that you consume. But the public has no need to call this cloud computing. Sounds like an online service, and it is. And they know what that means already. Leave well enough alone. What happens in data centers should stay in data centers.

"Well," you say (as your dwindling audience tries to escape), "there is more to it. It may be transparent to you but from the perspective of the cloud service provider, it enables them to scale with demand by using technologies such as virtualization and automation that dynamically re-allocate capacity and compute resources to manage and optimize IT infrastructure and enable charge back." Cue the sound of a record needle being dragged across a record.

"Okay, forget that. Let's say you work in a big company in an IT department. Instead of installing all of your software locally, you can keep most of it on a pool of servers and storage arrays and enable role-based access to the software, infrastructure, and development platforms and customize the security, performance, and availability to the needs of each user, while tracking individual consumption and charging the business units accordingly. And you can combine your private cloud with public cloud to make a hybrid cloud. Isn't that cool?"

Congratulations. You now have zero friends. Thankfully, your avatar has many. But next time, remember, if you want to continue receiving invitations to social gatherings of any sort, you may be better off saying, "cloud computing is basically just the Internet."

 

By: Jeffrey Abbott
Jeffrey Abbott ( @JeffreyAbbott ) is a Senior Product Marketing Manager for Cloud Commons at CA Technologies. In this role, Jeff focuses on industry trends and IT management challenges to position the company’s cloud solutions to viable market segments. When he’s not thinking about clouds, Jeff is often...
Read More..

6 people have left comments:

Cloud computing is the decoupling of the business benefits from the operation of the underlying compute assets so that each can be independently optimized...regardless of where the compute assets exist and regardless of the purpose of the business. Business owners should not know or care to know where those assets are, just that when they want to so do something, they can. The guys in the datacenter should neither know nor care what is running on the equipment they manage...but that it should be firing on all cylinders and humming. That's cloud computing.

Posted by: Trevor Williamson | January 25, 2011 10:13 PM

@Trevor – I think you are on to something. You’ve done a nice job of boiling down how each of the constituencies interacts with cloud computing models. You’ve suggested the accessibility and on-demand self service functionality from the standpoint of the business owner. And you’ve hinted at the elasticity and resource pooling that happens in the data center. I think the only missing element is the notion of usage metering or “pay as you go.”

Now, if we could just figure out how to talk about it at cocktail parties without frightening away the guests... :)

Posted by: Jeffrey Abbott | January 26, 2011 10:15 AM

I read your article ‘Why It's a Mistake to Educate the Public on Cloud Computing’ and I disagree, sort of. I agree that Microsoft Oracle and others have long benefited by being attributed with all the advantages of internet computing and the public perception that these benefits are largely micro computer based as your article implies. The generation of a market differentiating term called ‘the cloud’ that moves that association to what are traditionally mainframe software vendors is a needed marketing attempt to rebalance that. You said ‘I would love to know what they are trying to achieve.’ I had read an article this last quarter that stated Microsoft stock was being negatively impacted because the company was not promoting a cloud solution set. It seems that us ‘geeks’ have the ear of the investment community to a degree and that impacts the perception of utility and stock price (which enables easier capital raising which enables more corporate acquisitions.) The perception of product differentiation is as good as actual product enhancements and promotes sales. This is something we want to encourage and I did not get that tone from the article. Granted the technical details are an acquired nitch taste and make for a dry sale but MS has it right by selling the buzz. Remember Sizzler steak house ‘sell the sizzle.’ Buzz excitement and bravado the faith in future gains direction and growth is what all investments are about both from a product and from a stock perspective. Hopefully informed decisions on features functions and ROI are made regarding products but we all know that is not always the case. The market is subjective in estimating future returns and that subjectivity is a big part of the decision making process. Your point that selling the could on its technical merits is well taken and that is why the MS commercial is so campy. So you actually answer your own question. They are attempting to sell the buzz because the tech sale fails at social events. Given the investment CA technologies has made in the Cloud we really should promote the buzz, without being a boring tech nerd like you point out, and we can combat the MS advertisement with dismissive phrases like ‘To the cloud’ is a comic book like gross over simplification. Although MS is correct in selling the buzz or sizzle we should not be dismissive of the issue! Instead we should have our own elevator or 30 second speech that pumps them up and differentiates our products as supporting a new way of doing computing that lowers the IT investments needed to jump into any business by lowering the entry costs. Ca Cloud efforts are promoting competition and enabling new upstart companies to have a real shot at competing with the existing old order oligopolies. This is a game changer and CA is on top of it while MS is playing Batman!

Posted by: David Colbourn | January 31, 2011 11:01 AM

Makes sense David,

To your point, at the cocktail party, someone did start the conversation by saying “What IS cloud computing? (as in: “I’ve heard of it. I feel like I should know what it is, but I don’t”).” There is a decent chance he heard it from one of those television ads. So the question is, what is the value of having the general public be aware that there is this thing happening out there called cloud computing? It may be impossible to get them to understand it. But it’s good that they are asking about it. So the answer must be “the value of brand.”

It’s similar to 3G and 4G networks. People want to know they’ve got the best, but they don’t know what defines it. As far as I know, there is no governing body or definition of what a 3G or 4G network is. But 4 must be better than 3, so consumers ask for it. In the case of cloud, we have a definition (more or less), but it’s too complex for normal conversation with most audiences. Regardless, cloud sounds like the next big thing in computing, so there is value in having people think you’re part of it, whatever “it” is.

So perhaps with cloud, there will be some trickle down, or trickle up, where some consumer-level buzz influences overall brand perceptions just enough to influence the investment community, and boost stock prices, and fuel more R&D for the businesses that stuck their flags in the ground first. However at the next cocktail party, I still need to consider how much to sacrifice my personal brand for the benefit of CA’s brand. CA, you’ve been good to me so far, so I promise you I will try!

Posted by: Jeffrey Abbott | January 31, 2011 3:14 PM

I'm honored to be quoted, even if I did over simplify.  You owe me a beer.  

Posted by: Scott Farrell | February 18, 2011 3:47 PM

Only 9 months ago, I was writing about how the word "cloud" has no business being used on the

Posted by: The CA Cloud Storm Chasers | December 19, 2011 1:36 PM

Leave a Comment

* An asterisk indicates a required field

* :  

:

* :  

 Submit